Maprix
EN
Türkçe English
Start 7-day free trial7-day free trial

Multi-location businesses

Give every branch its own local visibility baseline

A repeatable multi-location workflow: verify each branch, scan around its real address with consistent settings, and review each map before your team compares branches.

Card required. No charge for the first 7 days. Cancel before the trial ends.

Three white shops on separate purple glass maps, each with one floating pin
Workflow illustration — three branches measured in their own neighbourhoods.

The workflow

A separate measurement for each branch

  1. Check the branch profile

    Confirm that the location is eligible for its own profile and that its name, address, hours and phone reflect the real staffed branch.

    Profile Audit
  2. Scan around its address

    Set a grid around the branch and keep its search terms, area and device consistent across later scans. Do not combine separate neighbourhoods into one grid.

    Rank Tracker
  3. Schedule and inspect

    Repeat each branch scan on a regular schedule, then open its saved dates separately. Review the branch map before your team records its comparison in its own table.

    Auto Tracking

Inside the product

Auto Tracking

Scheduled scans and a daily summary email

Explore how it works

Interface walkthrough · illustrative data

Set up each branch profile

One company can operate in several local markets, but customers search from the area around a real location. Check that each branch has an accurate, eligible Google Business Profile. A branch that receives customers should show its real visiting address. An eligible service-area business that does not receive customers at its base should use the appropriate service-area setup and hide that address. Keep names, hours and contact details accurate. Do not create extra profiles merely to cover more service areas. Read Google’s profile eligibility guidance before setting up a branch profile.

Then set up one measurement area around each branch. Rank Tracker records where the business appears across the selected grid, while Auto Tracking repeats a saved setup on a schedule. Keep branch settings independent; a grid stretched across multiple cities asks a different question from a grid around one storefront.

Make a fair comparison for each location

For a useful time series, keep the same search terms, grid centre, spacing and device for each branch. Compare one location with its own earlier scans. If a branch moved, changed hours or updated its profile, write that down beside the result. Changing several inputs between scans can make a chart difficult to interpret.

Mobile and desktop can show different results, so review them as separate measurements. Use a consistent schedule that gives the team time to complete profile work and then inspect the next scan. The multi-location guide covers branch profiles and central oversight; the grid tracking guide explains how area and point spacing affect what the map can show.

Look beyond the team comparison

A team can compare branch records to spot broad patterns, but that review cannot replace the map for each location. A strong branch may look healthy while another remains hard to find in its own neighbourhood. Review each branch’s coverage and point distribution before deciding where to focus.

Record the comparison by branch and date in the team’s own working table. This keeps the conversation grounded in local conditions: what customers see near that branch, what changed since its last scan and which profile details the team will review next. The result is an operating routine, not a promised rank.

Common questions

Should every branch have its own Google Business Profile?

A real, eligible location should have a profile that reflects that branch. Do not create extra profiles merely to cover more service areas; eligible service-area businesses can have their own profile. Check Google's current eligibility guidance.

Can I compare branches with one large grid?

Keep each branch's grid around its own address. A single large grid mixes different local markets and can hide the pattern around an individual branch.

How do I make scans comparable over time?

Keep the search terms, area, point spacing and device consistent for that branch. If you change an input, record it and start a new comparison series.

Can one company-wide metric tell me how each branch is doing?

Not by itself. Compare each branch's map and coverage separately so a stronger location does not obscure a weaker one. Your team can record that branch-by-branch comparison in its own table.

Go deeper